Military engineering is the art, science and practice of designing and building military works and maintaining the lines of transport and communication an army depends on, and it stands as the historical predecessor from which civil engineering itself later split off. Ancient Rome fielded the first dedicated corps of military engineering specialists, capable of feats such as building a thirty-mile fortification around the city of Alesia in six weeks; the discipline then stagnated for roughly six centuries after Rome's decline before reviving in the Middle Ages around siege warfare. Gunpowder reshaped the field again, forcing fortification design to withstand cannon fire and producing the trace italienne fortress design of sixteenth-century Europe, and by the eighteenth century most major armies had incorporated pioneer detachments handling construction, bridge-building and terrain preparation as standing units. Modern military engineering covers three primary functions, combat engineering in direct battlefield support, strategic support such as building airfields and ports, and ancillary support such as mapping and ordnance disposal, and now draws on mechanical and electrical engineering alongside its older core of construction and demolition, including specialized areas such as explosives engineering and defense against chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear threats.
Facts
Core ConcernThe art, science and practice of designing and building military works and maintaining the lines of military transport and communication an army depends on. 1 Core PrincipleNATO defines military engineering as the engineer activity undertaken, regardless of component or service, to shape the physical operating environment, supporting maneuver and the force as a whole, including force protection, counter-IED work, environmental protection, engineer intelligence and military search. 1 FAQs
Is military engineering the same as combat engineering?
Combat engineering is one part of military engineering, the work combat engineers do directly in support of frontline operations, building or breaching obstacles, clearing mines and constructing temporary bridges and fortifications under operational conditions. Military engineering is the broader field defined by NATO as the engineer activity undertaken to shape the physical operating environment, which also includes longer-term construction of bases, roads, ports and other infrastructure that supports a military force even far from combat.
Connections
Associated With
Includes
Source Tadeusz Kościuszko (Wikipedia)
Source Vitruvius (Wikipedia)
Open Questions
Source Lancelot de Mole (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Military Engineering (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia contributors, Wikimedia Foundationlead section, opening definition
Military engineering is loosely defined as the art, science, and practice of designing and building military works and maintaining lines of military transport and military communications.
According to NATO paragraph
military engineering is that engineer activity undertaken, regardless of component or service, to shape the physical operating environment. Military engineering incorporates support to maneuver and to the force as a whole, including military engineering functions such as engineer support to force protection, counter improvised explosive devices, environmental protection, engineer intelligence and military search.
Etymology section
The word engineer was initially used in the context of warfare, dating back to c. 1380 when it referred to "a constructor of military engines".
View the Source Vitruvius (Wikipedia)
Includes: Vitruvius, Wikipedia lead, paragraph 4Quote, Includes: Vitruvius, Wikipedia lead, paragraph 4
As an army engineer he specialized in the construction of ballista and scorpio artillery war machines for sieges.
View the Source Tadeusz Kościuszko (Wikipedia)
Includes: Tadeusz Kościuszko, Wikipedia lead, paragraph 1Quote, Includes: Tadeusz Kościuszko, Wikipedia lead, paragraph 1
was a Polish military engineer, statesman, and military leader
View the Source Open Questions (1 open question)
De Mole or Tritton and Wilson: who deserves credit for inventing the tank?
Lancelot de Mole submitted a tracked armoured vehicle design to the British War Office in 1912, four years before tanks first saw combat, and a 1919 Royal Commission found his invention had anticipated and in some respects surpassed the design actually used in 1916, yet awarded the official credit and payment to William Tritton and Walter Wilson because de Mole's rejected design had no proven causal influence on their independent development.
What would resolve this Documentary proof that de Mole's 1912 or 1914 submissions were actually seen and used by the Landships Committee or by Tritton and Wilson would overturn the Royal Commission's finding of no causal connection.
History of military engineeringLancelot de Mole (Wikipedia)
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.