Axiomatic design is a systems design methodology that uses matrix methods to trace how customer needs turn into functional requirements, design parameters and process variables. Its central device is a design matrix that relates a set of functional requirements to a set of design parameters, so a designer can see which parameters drive which requirements. The method takes its name from two design axioms, given without proof, that guide analysis and decision making. The Independence Axiom says to keep the functional requirements independent of one another, and the Information Axiom says to minimize the information content of the design. Where changing one design parameter noticeably affects two separate requirements, the requirements are said to be coupled, and matrix analysis of the design matrix is used to assess and reduce that coupling. The Information Axiom supplies a measure of the probability that a design parameter will deliver the performance a requirement needs, so lower-risk systems are preferred. The methodology has been developed since the 1990s by Nam Pyo Suh at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, in its Department of Mechanical Engineering, and has been presented at a series of academic conferences.
Connections
Associated With
Source Axiomatic design (Wikipedia)
Source Axiomatic design (Wikipedia)
In Field
Source Axiomatic design (Wikipedia)
Sources
Axiomatic design (Wikipedia)
In Field: Mechanical Engineering, Final paragraph
developed by Dr. Suh Nam Pyo at MIT, Department of Mechanical Engineering since the 1990s
Associated With: Design structure matrix, See also
Design structure matrix (DSM)
Associated With: Six Sigma, See also [associated-with]
Design for Six Sigma
In Group: Engineering Design and Analysis Methods, Lead paragraph
Axiomatic design is a systems design methodology using matrix methods to systematically analyze the transformation of customer needs into functional requirements, design parameters, and process variables.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.